> It seemed like a good idea to me. I find trying to read > README.developer rather tedious, altho I do agree that a plain text file > can be grep'ed and etc. > > If there's feeling that README.developer should be left as is, then I > can certainly revert the changes.
I think having one concise document which shows the way how new development should be made is a good thing. The WSDG from the website looks like generated from docbook. So we could generate a plain text file from that and put it a README.developer into the sources. ---> Dirk Jagdmann ^ doj / cubic ----> http://cubic.org/~doj -----> http://llg.cubic.org ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
