What are you talking about? It's Wednesday. Everyone knows that UTF8Strings have indefinite lengths on Wednesdays.
On Dec 15, 2010, at 8:50 AM, Jaap Keuter wrote: > Hi, > > "With the proper use of subtrees the structure of even the most complex > protocols becomes clear." > ... and then came ASN.1 ... ;) > > Thanks, > Jaap > > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:32:13 +0100, "news.gmane.com" > <andreassand...@gmx.net> wrote: >> "Jaap Keuter" <jaap.keu...@xs4all.nl> wrote in >> message news:75883c052eaf82074dac3aef04d29...@xs4all.nl... >>> Hi, >>> >>> This 'colorize' is mainly intended to mark changeover into another >>> protocol. >>> Usually you see this at the top level (from the root), but occasionally >>> when a protocol is encapsulated (some ITU protocols show this). >>> As long as your 'structures' are at the top level, these could be >>> considered valid use if they are truly independant, otherwise it's just >>> poor style. >> >> Well the protocol is designed as it is. And I think you agree that it would >> be an abuse to highlight structure starts similar (but not identically) as a >> protocol. >> >> Does anybody see any other way to help the eyes to find the next structure >> in a complex packet structure? >> >> -- >> Andy >> > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
