Thanks for the info. I'll try it. But for now the hex editor is Ok. ________________________________________ Von: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] im Auftrag von Helge Kruse [helge.kruse-nos...@gmx.net] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. November 2010 13:16 An: Developer support list for Wireshark; wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] foo dissector of the dev guide
-------- Original-Nachricht -------- > Datum: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 11:22:19 +0100 > Von: Lange Jan-Erik <jan-erik.la...@haw-hamburg.de> > An: Developer support list for Wireshark <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Betreff: Re: [Wireshark-dev] foo dissector of the dev guide > You're right. I captured UDP Frames from my network. Now I'm working with > these Frames an modify them in a HEX Editor for testing.. > Have you considered to use text2pcap? Since the source text editor is always open this might be helpful. Helge -- GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 €/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
