Hi
Thanks for the help.

Do I need to raise a separate bug for these things to be in place ?
What other formalities are there ?

Thanks
Sourabh Rathor

On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Anders Broman
<anders.bro...@ericsson.com>wrote:

>  Hi,
> >output of the cli :
> >debian:/home/sourabh/wireshark-1.2.6# wireshark -gtk2\wireshark -v
> >wireshark 1.2.6
> That probably explains it if you are going to do development you are better
> off working from trunk not the stabele release branch.
> There is about 8 month of development worth of changes between 1.2.6 and
> trunk :-)
> Regards
> Andees
>
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:
> wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] *On Behalf Of *Sourabh Rathor
> *Sent:* den 15 februari 2010 09:43
>
> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Muxing with compressed header
>
> output of the cli :
> debian:/home/sourabh/wireshark-1.2.6# wireshark -gtk2\wireshark -v
> wireshark 1.2.6
>
> Copyright 1998-2010 Gerald Combs <ger...@wireshark.org> and contributors.
> This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
> warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
>
> Compiled with GTK+ 2.12.12, with GLib 2.16.6, with libpcap 0.9.8, with libz
> 1.2.3.3, without POSIX capabilities, with libpcre 7.6, without SMI, without
> c-ares, without ADNS, without Lua, with GnuTLS 2.4.2, with Gcrypt 1.4.1,
> without
> Kerberos, without GeoIP, without PortAudio, without AirPcap.
>
> Running on Linux 2.6.26-2-686, with libpcap version 0.9.8, GnuTLS 2.4.2,
> Gcrypt
> 1.4.1.
>
> Built using gcc 4.3.2.
>
> Thanks
> Sourabh Rathor
>
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Sourabh Rathor <
> sourabhrathor2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Ya . I am planning to add this dissector too. I guess it would resolve
>> this compression issue then.
>>
>> I'l raise a bug for the same.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Sourabh Rathor
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Anders Broman <
>> anders.bro...@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Hi,
>>> Patches are best submitted as patch/diffs trough bugzilla.
>>>  >Its not there in the makefile.
>>> ??? What does wireshark-gtk2\wireshark -v output on your build?
>>>
>>>  >rtpcompressdissector = find_dissector("compress_rtp");
>>> Are you planning to submit the "compress_rtp" dissector too?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Anders
>>>
>>>
>>>  ------------------------------
>>>  *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:
>>> wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] *On Behalf Of *Sourabh Rathor
>>> *Sent:* den 15 februari 2010 07:59
>>>
>>> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
>>> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Muxing with compressed header
>>>
>>>   Hi Anders,
>>>
>>> Its not there in the makefile.
>>> For RTP muxing with compressed header. I have made some changes to
>>> packet-nb_rtpmux.c as shown:
>>> ****
>>> Change 1. (In dissect_nb_rtpmux.c)
>>>  if (rtpcompressdissector)
>>>             {
>>>                 next_tvb = tvb_new_subset(tvb, offset+5,
>>>                         MIN(tvb_length(tvb)-5-offset, length), length);
>>>
>>>                 call_dissector(rtpcompressdissector, next_tvb, pinfo,
>>> nb_rtpmux_tree);
>>>             }
>>>             else
>>>             {
>>>                 proto_tree_add_item(nb_rtpmux_tree,
>>>                     hf_nb_rtpmux_data, tvb, offset+5, length == 0 ?
>>> -1:length, FALSE);
>>>             }
>>> *****
>>> Change 2.
>>>
>>> void
>>> proto_reg_handoff_nb_rtpmux(void)
>>> {
>>>     static gboolean inited = FALSE;
>>>
>>>     if (!inited) {
>>>
>>>         dissector_handle_t nb_rtpmux_handle;
>>>
>>> /*  Use new_create_dissector_handle() to indicate that
>>> dissect_nb_rtpmux()
>>>  *  returns the number of bytes it dissected (or 0 if it thinks the
>>> packet
>>>  *  does not belong to PROTONAME).
>>>  */
>>>         nb_rtpmux_handle = new_create_dissector_handle(dissect_nb_rtpmux,
>>>             proto_nb_rtpmux);
>>>
>>>         dissector_add_handle("udp.port", nb_rtpmux_handle);
>>>         rtpcompressdissector = find_dissector("compress_rtp");
>>>         inited = TRUE;
>>>     }
>>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> And also written a new dissector function for RTP packets with
>>> compresssed headers as shown below:
>>> static int
>>> dissect_compress_rtp(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree)
>>> {
>>>
>>> /* Set up structures needed to add the protocol subtree and manage it */
>>>        proto_item *ti;
>>>        proto_tree *compress_rtp_tree;
>>> /*Need to add some checks here.....(Heuristics)*/
>>>
>>> /* Make entries in Protocol column and info column on summary display */
>>>        col_set_str(pinfo->cinfo,COL_PROTOCOL,"Compress_RTP");
>>>
>>>        if(tree) {
>>>        unsigned int offset = 0;
>>>
>>> /* Create displays subtree for the protocol */
>>>
>>>        //while()
>>>
>>>        guint16 timestamp, sequence_no;
>>>
>>>        ti =
>>> proto_tree_add_item(tree,proto_compress_rtp,tvb,offset,-1,FALSE);
>>>        compress_rtp_tree = proto_item_add_subtree(ti,ett_compress_rtp);
>>>
>>>
>>> proto_tree_add_item(compress_rtp_tree,hf_compress_rtp_sequence_no,tvb,offset,1,FALSE);
>>>        timestamp = tvb_get_ntohs(tvb,offset);
>>>
>>> proto_tree_add_uint(compress_rtp_tree,hf_compress_rtp_timestamp,tvb,offset+1,2,FALSE);
>>>
>>> proto_tree_add_item(compress_rtp_tree,hf_compress_rtp_data,tvb,offset+3,-1,FALSE);
>>>
>>>        return tvb_length(tvb);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>> Any feedback for the same.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Sourabh Rathor
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Anders Broman <
>>> anders.bro...@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  Hi,
>>>> ??? It's in the makefile, in my SVN tree, on the server...
>>>> Are youi doing svn co 
>>>> http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/wireshark/trunk/wireshark ?
>>>>
>>>> /Anders
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>  *From:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:
>>>> wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] *On Behalf Of *Sourabh Rathor
>>>> *Sent:* den 10 februari 2010 09:22
>>>> *To:* Developer support list for Wireshark
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [Wireshark-dev] RTP Muxing with compressed header
>>>>
>>>>   Hi Anders,
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your input. This file is not visible now in the latest trunks
>>>> and in the trunks before. Is it removed ?
>>>> Does it support the compression or just the muxing functionality ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks In advance
>>>> Sourabh Rathor
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Anders Broman <a.bro...@telia.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> There is a basic dissector to expand on, packet-nb_rtpmux.c.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Anders
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> *Från:* wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org [mailto:
>>>>> wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] *För *Sourabh Rathor
>>>>> *Skickat:* den 10 februari 2010 05:43
>>>>> *Till:* wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
>>>>> *Ämne:* [Wireshark-dev] RTP Muxing with compressed header
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I am actually looking or designing a new dissector function for
>>>>> decoding RTP MUXed streams with compressed headers. This is compliant to
>>>>> 3GPP TS 29.414. Need some inputs to start working on the same. Please 
>>>>> reply
>>>>> if any body has any pointers for it.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Sourabh Rathor
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>>>>> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>>>             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>>>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sourabh Rathor
>>>> Institute Of Informatics & Communication
>>>> South Campus, Delhi University
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>>>> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>>             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sourabh Rathor
>>> Institute Of Informatics & Communication
>>> South Campus, Delhi University
>>>
>>>
>>> ___________________________________________________________________________
>>> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
>>> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
>>> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>>>             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org
>>> ?subject=unsubscribe
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sourabh Rathor
>> Institute Of Informatics & Communication
>> South Campus, Delhi University
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sourabh Rathor
> Institute Of Informatics & Communication
> South Campus, Delhi University
>
> ___________________________________________________________________________
> Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
> Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
> Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
>             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
>



-- 
Sourabh Rathor
Institute Of Informatics & Communication
South Campus, Delhi University
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
             mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to