Hi Brian,
I found some (the?) documentation on Helen here:
https://www.darkcornersoftware.com/confluence/display/open/Packet+Structure. I
have no idea if this is the definitive Helen specification or not, but based on
the documentation, here is some additional feedback:
Header:
This 1st assignment of helen_sub_item is not needed:
helen_sub_item = proto_tree_add_item(helen_tree, hf_helen_magic, tvb,
offset, 2, FALSE);
The System Tx Time: is 8 bytes and indicates ms since the Epoch. Your
hf_helen_txTime field is declared as an FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME, but that implies that
you have an 8 byte field whose 1st 4 bytes represent seconds and last 4
represent nanoseconds, but that isn't the case. This field is simply an
FT_INT64 (or FT_UINT64 if you don't care to represent ms before the Epoch).
The Helen "spec" is ambiguous as to whether it's signed or unsigned, but I
suspect signed since I saw some Java references in there.
With that in mind, there's no reason at all to bother with nanoseconds as you
wouldn't be adding an FT_ABSOLUTE_TIME to the tree, you'd be adding the
FT_INT64. All this just means changing this:
proto_tree_add_time_format(helen_tree, hf_helen_txTime, tvb, offset, 8,
&t,
"Date: %s %2d, %d %02d:%02d:%02d
UTC",mon_names[tmp->tm_mon],tmp->tm_mday,
tmp->tm_year +
1900,tmp->tm_hour,tmp->tm_min,tmp->tm_sec,(long)t.nsecs);
to this:
proto_tree_add_uint_format(helen_tree, hf_helen_txTime, tvb, offset, 8,
msecs_since_the_epoch,
"Date: %s %2d, %d %02d:%02d:%02d
UTC",mon_names[tmp->tm_mon],tmp->tm_mday,
tmp->tm_year +
1900,tmp->tm_hour,tmp->tm_min,tmp->tm_sec, msecs_since_the_epoch%1000);
And of course using gmtime() means you have an inherent year 2038 problem:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem, but since this field is in ms,
it won't be wrong for almost another full second after everyone else ... so
you've got that going for you! :)
Codes:
There seem to be number of Helen Packet Codes defined that your dissector
doesn't yet support. It's already been mentioned below about using
value_string, but I suggest you use a range_string for the codes. For example:
static const range_string helen_code[] = {
{0x8000, 0xfffe, "Experimental"},
{0xffff, 0xffff, "Encryption Extension"},
{0, 0, "Tail"},
{1, 1, "GPS Extension"},
{2, 2, "Flow Extension"},
{3, 3, "Host Extension"},
{4, 4, "File Extension"},
{5, 999, "Reserved"},
{1000, 1000, "Minotaur SA Extension"},
...
{16000, 32767, "Unassigned"},
{0, 0, NULL}
};
Read more about range_string in doc/README.developer, paying close attention to
RVALS() and BASE_RANGE_STRING. Then, when you add the code to the tree, you
simply do something like this for each code:
proto_tree_add_item(helen_ext_tree, hf_helen_code, tvb, offset, 2, FALSE);
You should probably use at least one new ett_, such as ett_helen_ext for the
extensions, rather than using ett_helen. Alternatively, you could have a
unique ett for each extension if you want.
So you're missing a lot of the codes, but even the codes that you currently do
support seem to be lacking. Take for example the GPS Extension: First off,
you don't populate the "Fields Available" field at all. It should be added to
the helen tree then sub-treed with the bits comprising it (i.e., have its own
ett so it can expand independently of other trees). It's nice to have a 1-line
summary of all bitfields so you don't necessarily have to expand the tree to
decipher which bits are set. The Boolean bits themselves are usually populated
from msb to lsb, although the fields indicated must be populated according to
the "spec". Unfortunately, the Helen "spec" is ambiguous in this regard.
Here's an example of what the tree could look like as I describe (I assume the
fields are added according to lsb to msb based on your implementation, but I
indicate which fields are present from msb to lsb, as this yields a
left-to-right expansion of the tree, which is what you normally see.):
Not expanded, you would see:
+ Fields Available: 0x61 (speed, bearing, status)
And when expanded, you would see:
- Fields Available: 0x61 (speed, bearing, status)
0....... = Number of Satellites: Not Present
.1...... = Speed: Present
..1..... = Bearing: Present
...0.... = Altitude: Not Present
....0... = Latitude: Not Present
.....0.. = Longitude: Not Present
......0. = Time: Not Present
.......1 = Status: Present
Have a look at epan/dissectors/packet-ip.c, which contains some examples of
this type of bit expansion in the "Differentiated Services Field" and "Flags"
fields.
As for the helen gps extension fields themselves, Mike and Gerasimos already
gave you good advice on reducing the code to add the status code ... although
it can be reduced even further:
if (fieldsAvail & GPS_EXT_STATUS_MASK)
proto_tree_add_item(helen_sub_tree, hf_helen_gpsstatus, tvb, offset++,
1, FALSE);
Hopefully this gives you some helpful pointers.
A few parting tips: Be sure to read doc/README.developer, try to use
proto_tree_add_item() as much as possible, avoid proto_tree_add_text() unless
you really have no idea what the data represents, if you can't use
proto_tree_add_item() or don't want to for whatever reason, keep in mind what
the type of data the payload actually represents and use the appropriate
proto_tree_add_xyz() function to do it. For example, don't read an integer,
format it into a string and then use proto_tree_add_string_format(). The data
is not a string, it's an integer, so you would use
proto_tree_add_uint_format(), assuming it's unsigned. Lastly, be sure to take
advantage of the many existing dissectors in epan/dissectors/packet-*.c as
guides to help you further improve your dissector. Look at common ones (ip,
udp, ...) or ones whose protocols you have some familiarity with so you
understand the data presented, then go look at how the author accomplished it.
Good luck.
- Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Maynard, Chris
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 10:37 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] preliminary code submission
Some other observations/feedback:
You should look again at the doc/README.developer skeleton code and follow the
common structure there. For example, you need to add a GPL statement, you
should move the handoff and register routines to the bottom, etc.
Run tools/check*.pl on your dissector.
Fuzztest your dissector if you haven't already done so.
I would recommend breaking up your for() loop into smaller functions and add
some handling for an unknown code. For example:
for (;;) {
...
if (code == 0)
break;
else if (code == 1)
offset += dissect_gps(...);
else if (code == 2)
offset += dissect_flow(...);
else if (code == 3)
offset += dissect_host(...);
else
offset += dissect_unknown(...);
...
}
Or replace the if()/else if()/else structure with a switch() and use an
appropriate condition to exit your for() loop. Or you could use a vector
table, i.e.,
#define MAX_CODES 4
static guint32 (*dissect_code[MAX_CODES])(...) = {
dissect_null, dissect_gps, dissect_flow, dissect_host
};
if (code < MAX_CODES)
offset += dissect_code[code](...);
else
offset += dissect_unknown(...);
Port 7636 is not registered with IANA.
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers
Is that a port you picked? You should either register it or add a preference
to make the port configurable or choose a port past the registered port range.
Is this protocol documented anywhere? You should reference the RFC(s) or
whatever it is that describes it.
- Chris
-----Original Message-----
From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
[mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Gerasimos Dimitriadis
Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2010 4:40 AM
To: Developer support list for Wireshark
Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] preliminary code submission
Hi Brian,
there is no need to add a text string as blurb, if it is the same as
the title of the field, so for example the ipv4 one would become:
{ &hf_helen_ipv4,
{ "IPv4", "helen.ipv4address", FT_IPv4, BASE_NONE,
NULL, 0x0,
NULL, HFILL}},
Also, continuing from Michael's comments there is no need to read the
value of status and use proto_tree_add_uint, since you are not using
status later on. I think that it would be best to change it to:
void dissect_helen(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree)
{
[...]
/* Status: */
if ((fieldsAvail & 1) != 0) {
proto_tree_add_item(helen_sub_tree, hf_helen_gpsstatus,
tvb, offset, 1, FALSE);
offset += 1;
}
[...]
}
Also at dissect_helen, I propose to deal with the packet code in the
same way as the gpsstatus. Add an entry for it in the hf[] array,
define an array of value_string with the code names (i.e. End of
Packet, GPS Extension...) and use proto_tree_add_item to add it to the
tree. Apart from all other advantages, you don't need to explicitly
deal with the unknown code strings.
Best regards,
Gerasimos
2010/2/4 Speck Michael EHWG AVL/GAE <michael.sp...@avl.com>:
> Hi Brian,
>
> just had a look on your latest preview.
> There is one more thing you can do to reduce the code size even further:
> as Jakub has already suggested earlier, it is a good idea to use
> value_string struct to map values with strings. In your case it is
> especially true for the GPS status.
>
> There are only a few changes necessary to your code. First define a
> value_string typed constant, then slightly change the status field
> definition in function proto_register_helen() and finally shorten the
> status field dissection in function dissect_helen(). Below is shown how
> these code sections could look like afterwards.
>
>
> static const value_string helen_gps_status[] = {
> { 0, "Good" },
> { 1, "No Fix" },
> { 2, "Bad GPS Read" },
> { 0, NULL }
> };
>
>
> void proto_register_helen(void) {
> [...]
> { &hf_helen_gpsstatus,
> { "GPS Status", "helen.gpsStatus", FT_UINT8, BASE_DEC,
> VALS(helen_gps_status), 0x00,
> "GPS Status", HFILL}},
> [...]
> }
>
>
> void dissect_helen(tvbuff_t *tvb, packet_info *pinfo, proto_tree *tree)
> {
> [...]
> /* Status: */
> if ((fieldsAvail & 1) != 0) {
> guint8 status;
> status = tvb_get_guint8(tvb,offset);
> proto_tree_add_uint(helen_sub_tree, hf_helen_gpsstatus,
> tvb, offset, 1, status);
> offset += 1;
> }
> [...]
> }
>
>
>
> Cheers
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org
> [mailto:wireshark-dev-boun...@wireshark.org] On Behalf Of Brian Oleksa
> Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2010 21:21
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] preliminary code submission
>
> Jakub
>
> Yes...you are right. I am not using alot of those variables. I was
> mislead by what I was doing before I started to use the built in
> routines. :-)
>
> My code base keeps getting smaller and smaller. I do understand that
> code quality / readability is a key factor in this industry. I still
> need to fix my IDE to get the correct formatting.
>
> Perhaps once last quick look..?? Attached is the updated file.
>
> Thanks again for the great feedback..!!
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
>
> Jakub Zawadzki wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:05:32PM -0500, Brian Oleksa wrote:
>>
>>> Jakub
>>>
>>> Thanks for this feedback. It is always good to have an extra set of
>>> eyes :-)
>>>
>>
>> You missunderstood my comment about check_col()
>>
>> instead of:
>> if (check_col(pinfo->cinfo, COL_PROTOCOL))
>> col_set_str(pinfo->cinfo, COL_PROTOCOL, PROTO_TAG_HELEN);
>
>>
>> if (check_col(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO))
>> col_clear(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO);
>>
>> Just write:
>> col_set_str(pinfo->cinfo, COL_PROTOCOL, PROTO_TAG_HELEN);
>
>> col_clear(pinfo->cinfo, COL_INFO);
>>
>>
>>> gfloat latitude;
>>> latitude = tvb_get_ntohieee_float(tvb,offset);
>>>
>>> Why do you think this variable is not being used..??
>>>
>>
>> Well because it's not used :) What is used for?
>>
>> And one more thing...
>>
>> You declare: ett_helen_ipv6, ett_helen_nos, ...
>> I believe you need only ett_helen from ett_*
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The contents of this email are confidential
and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this
email in error, please delete it from your system immediately and
notify us either by email, telephone or fax. You should not copy,
forward, or otherwise disclose the content of the email.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
