Hi Didier, On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:54 PM, didier <dgauthe...@magic.fr> wrote: > Hi, > The whole file is first dissected sequentially with > pinfo->fd->flags.visited set to FALSE. > > The most common error for what you're seeing is that the code is inside > a if (tree) block, with the new packet list tree is null when loading a > file, before it was null only with colors disable. > > You can test if it's the case by setting a filter like 'frame' and > reloading the file with CTRL R.
You're right - if I first open the capture, filter (with "frame") and then reload, then looks like the flag is FALSE and the code block is executed. This function itself never tests "if <tree or subtree>", and so far I haven't found a situation where any of its parent functions in the stack do this. There's so little difference between what NFSv3 and NFSv4 dissecting is doing at this point, it seems unusual. But I'll keep looking. Thanks for the tip. I'm still not clear on why your example is a problem though - what's the logic error in doing this test during an "if (tree)" block? Thanks, Ian ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
