I've moved it back to the 20th. We found a couple of bugs here that can hopefully be fixed tomorrow.
Jaap Keuter wrote: > Hi, > > Here we go, Gerald set the date for 1.2.1 on July 16th. > > Gerald, need any help? > > Thanx, > Jaap > > Gerald Combs wrote: >> Anders Broman wrote: >>> Hi, >>> We have a considerable amount of fixed bugs in the queue and we are >>> getting a few bug reports on the Windows problems when >>> >>> no IP address is assigned on the interface so perhaps it's time to >>> consider a maintenance release? >>> >>> For the packet-x.c files where only bugfixes has been made should we >>> consider to copy the file across to get the hf blurb fixes >>> >>> copied to keep the sources as equal as possible? >> Many of the bug fixes in the queue are serious, and we need to get 1.2.1 >> out ASAP. There are several outstanding issues I'd like to get fixed first: >> >> - Overhaul the IPFIX dissector (bug 3471). >> - Bug 3672, which appears to be an off-by-one error in the reassembly >> code. >> - Review and check in the ZIOP patch attached to bug 3652. >> - Newer fuzz bugs (3688 and 3696), which I haven't looked at. >> >> I'm working on the IPFIX dissector right now. Anyone want to look at the >> other items? > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
