Hi, Le dimanche 22 mars 2009 à 02:13 +0800, yami a écrit : > Hi Didier, > > Thank you for trying the patch :) and all the good comments given. > > I've attached a new patch to the wiki. Please see my detailed reply > below. > > - If compiled without NDEBUG defined I get a failed assert: > epan/dfilter/wslimmat.c :1680 : fix_variables: "v->assignment > == v" > It seems like a 'bug' of gcc optimization. We can simply remove this > assertion, see explanations below. Possible but unlikely. I'm not 100% sure, but for me fix_pointer() needs -fno-strict-aliasing.
> Really? I've thought BSD license is looser than GPL (can you give me > more details?). http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses search for Original BSD license > > On the other hand, I find Wireshark code has already contains similar > licenses (am I right?), for example, > Menu -> Help -> About Wireshark -> License -> Part III has metioned > some. Yes but only two and three clauses BSD, not the original. > However using a SAT solver (even if it is a simple one) is the most > generalized way, which requires no special handling. And it is also a > good example of how math is applied in real life :) I'll try to merge it with http://wiki.wireshark.org/Development/Optimization , this version is already able to find 2000 DNS packets inside 7 millions packets in 1 second. > > Cons are > 1. SAT solvers are complicated. (But we may use a simple algorithm) > 2. Public available SAT solvers are mainly wrote by researchers, which may > not have time to maintain the software. > Didier ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
