I see. Thanks! Of course we can mark the excluded ones and save 'unmarked packets' for this scenario, however I feel 'saving unmarked' is not intuitive for end users.
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Stephen Fisher <st...@stephen-fisher.com>wrote: > On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 03:08:05PM +0800, yami wrote: > > > I can not figure out why marking all packets is a useful > > functionality. Could anyone kindly give some use cases? > > You can mark all packets, then unmark certain ones before saving. > > > Steve > > ___________________________________________________________________________ > Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> > Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev > Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev > mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe >
___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
