I'm most of the way (I hope) through a tn3270 dissector. However I'm not sure of the most acceptable way of doing a couple of things:
- Should I just make TN3270 a sub-dissector of telnet? So users select 'decode as telnet' and get the tn3270 dissected implicitly? Or should it have a separate 'decode as' entry? If the latter, I'm not sure how I can call telnet as a 'super-dissector' or alternatively, avoid duplicating code. - The best way of recognizing a tn3270 session is through the 'terminal type' telnet option at session negotiation. Browsing through other dissector code I can't find a canonical way of storing information about a given stream, other than possibly misusing the conversation api. I'm sure I'm missing a trick. What is the standard way of recognizing that a packet is from a stream previously identified as requiring a specific sub-dissector? Thanks! Robert ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
