Should the fact that the "Older Versions" section in http://www.gtk.org/download-linux.html does not show anyone bellow 2.4 be taken as a hint on what to do?
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Bill Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guy Harris wrote: > > > Ulf Lamping wrote: > > > >> > >> So there are not that many places that could show problems here - the > >> problem we have seems to be a lack of tests if GTK 2.0/2.2 is still > running. > >> > > One data point: > > The GTK+ version distribution in Wireshark bug reports not specifying > Windows as the OS and which give the GTK version is as follows: > > 1 GTK+ 2.0 [2006-11-03] > 3 GTK+ 2.2 [2005-10-28] > [2006-05-03] > [2008-02-17] > 64 GTK+ 2.4 > 144 GTK+ 2.6 > 4 GTK+ 2.7 > 114 GTK+ 2.8 > 158 GTK+ 2.10 > 2 GTK+ 2.11 > 149 GTK+ 2.12 > 1 GTK+ 2.15 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
