Stephen Fisher wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 03:01:47PM +1100, Andrew Hood wrote:
>
>
>>Is there any way to make use of unnamd steructs a compilation error?
>
>
> Not with gcc from what I can find so far.
>
>
>>+#define dst_addr16 dst_addr.dst_addr16
>>+#define dst_addr64 dst_addr.dst_addr64
>>+#define src_addr16 src_addr.src_addr16
>>+#define src_addr64 src_addr.src_addr64
>
>
> Can't we just change the uses of dst_addr16 and so on to
> dst_addr.dst_addr16 and so on and avoid using #define?
I tried that the last time I reported unnamed structs. The code that
wound in SVN used #define. I guess the probable rationale is that it is
much less code to change.
--
There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes.
-- Dr. Who
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
