Hi All, Hmmm... although some good ideas have been raised, they all had their disadvantages. Basically I think the way the filters work is fine for people who get used to the way the filters work. It is just a steep learning curve where the information needed to learn to use the display filter syntax on fields that have multiple occurences in one packet.
So, if we need to stick to the current behaviour (which I have become a favorite off by now), why not try to educate the user from within Wireshark instead of from the external sources like the Wiki and the Mailinglists. I think the idea of a pop-up explaining the way the operator "!=" works on fields with multiple occurences in one packet is a good way to educate people. But only if there is an option to "Don't show me this message again" :-) If we agree on this approach, all we have to do is decide in which cases the pop-up should be shown. Which is a whole new discussion :-) Some random thoughts: a) Every time "!=" is used, just to educate the user up front. But I think the learning experience only kicks in when the user can see the bad behaviour. And this would not happen on all the fields that only have one occurence in every packet. b) Only show the message when the field that is used with the "!=" operator actually does occur mulptiple times in one of the packets in the trace file. This however would mean a big degradation in performance. c) Only on when "ip.addr != xxx", "tcp.port != xxx" or "udp.port != xxx" is typed as a filter. The idea is that this is probable the first occurence of "!=" the user will try on a field with multiple occurences in one packet. This might be a good compromise... Oh, we also would need to write a very nice compact, easy to understand message. With of course a link for some more background and examples to the Wiki. Cheers, Sake _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev