Stig, > > There is basic P7 support in Wireshark in SVN 23479. > > I will try this dissector on our P7 traffic.
Thanks. BTW, I know the content attribute won't get decoded correctly at the moment if it is before the envelope attribute in a fetch result. Can you run P7 over RTSE? > But should we be more consistent on the naming policy? > E.g. rename asn1/p7 to asn1/x413 and packet-p7 to packet-x413? Actually, my intention is to go the other way - I want to rename x411, x420 and s4406 (to p1, p22, and p772 respectively) - this makes more sense (to me) for protocol filtering etc, and aligns with the disp/dap/dop/dsp naming. So the choice of p7 was deliberate on my part - but I would welcome your views. Graeme _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
