Hi, The g_warning() was my fault and should be fixed in http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=23430 I've sent a mail to the author about the other problem. Regards Anders
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stephen Fisher Sent: den 13 november 2007 05:00 To: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 23428:/trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: Makefile.commonpacket-tpncp.c /trunk/packaging/nsis/: wireshark.nsi/trunk/tpncp/: tpncp.dat /trunk/: Makefile.am Makefile.nmake On Sun, Nov 11, 2007 at 01:23:26PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=23428 > > User: etxrab > Date: 2007/11/11 01:23 PM > > Log: > From Valery Sigalov: > New dissector for TPNCP protocol. > http://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1853 This check-in created two messages on the console when I start Wireshark in Unix: 20:57:13 Warn filepath /usr/local/src/wireshark/tpncp/tpncp.dat Duplicate field detected in call to proto_register_field_array: channel_id is already registered The Warn is from a simple g_warning() call, but I don't know how to dissector works in relation to the .dat file to know why channel_id is registered twice. I do see it once in the epan/dissectors/packet-tpncp.c and "channel_id" listed in the .dat file - maybe that's it. Could someone take a look at this? Thanks, Steve _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
