Richard van der Hoff wrote: > I think, however, that before you spend too much more time on this, > somebody ought to review what you've done so far to check that we're all > on the same page with respect to what are good changes. It would be a > shame if you spent weeks on it and we had to say "uh, no, you've got the > wrong idea."
Apart from anything else, if we go and change half of the dissector fields, is that going to upset people who are used to the old names? _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
