Mike Duigou wrote: > Gerald Combs wrote: >> We've had a problem with patches sent to wireshark-dev being missed and >> ignored for a while now. In order to try to keep this from happening, we >> now have new patch submission guidelines: instead of sending them to the >> list, they should be sent to Bugzilla and marked for review. > > I don't see a Keyword or status whiteboard field on the bug form. How > should issues with patches be marked for review?
On the attachment details page for the patch, the "review_for_checkin" flag should be set to "?". BTW, we previously requested that patches be compressed in order to get around MUAs mangling whitespace. We now request that they be _un_compressed, because Bugzilla expects attachments with the "patch" box checked to be text/plain. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
