Hi Guy,

do not you like dot in protocol name? :-)

Tomas
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:42 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Wireshark-commits] rev 21622: /trunk/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/:
packet-q932-ros.c packet-q932-ros.h packet-q932.c packet-qsig.c
/trunk/asn1/q932/: packet-q932-ros-template.c packet-q932-template.c
/trunk/asn1/qsig/: ...

http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=21622

User: guy
Date: 2007/04/30 06:41 AM

Log:
 The Q.932 dissector doesn't need to include <string.h>; the Q.932 ROS
 dissector does.
 
 The fix to the Makefile to generate packet-q932-ros.c changed the
 protocol name in some cases; change it uniformly.

Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/
  Changes    Path                 Action
  +35 -33    packet-q932-ros.c    Modified
  +2 -2      packet-q932-ros.h    Modified
  +9 -11     packet-q932.c        Modified
  +5 -5      packet-qsig.c        Modified

Directory: /trunk/asn1/q932/
  Changes    Path                          Action
  +5 -3      packet-q932-ros-template.c    Modified
  +4 -6      packet-q932-template.c        Modified

Directory: /trunk/asn1/qsig/
  Changes    Path                      Action
  +4 -4      packet-qsig-template.c    Modified

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-commits mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to