On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:06:35PM -0700, Guy Harris wrote:
> > I opened a bug in bugzilla per Guy Harris' request. If I remember
> > correctly it is bug number 1463. I was under the impression that
> > someone on the development team would be assigned and write the
> > dissector for me.
>
> Wireshark isn't run the way commercial software projects tend to be
> run, with bugs being assigned to a member of the development team
> officially tasked with fixing the problem; it's more a case of members
> of the development team picking up items they see when they have time
> and an interest - Wireshark isn't a day job for many of us.
I'll probably do it in the next few weeks, but I really don't have the
time right now. In case you want to write the dissector yourself: You
are more than welcome to do this and I'd be happy to assist. Otherwise
you'll have to wait until I or someone else finds the time to do it.
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
