There still be the IP addresses in net_src/net_dst. It would be much like M3UA does that replaces ip src and ip dst by the opc and dpc (which I do not doubt it is ok).
What I wonder about is whether the GT is an address or should it be just taken as a "port" on a certain address. On 3/28/07, Abhik Sarkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In case of SUA, wouldn't this mean pinfo->src and pinfo->dst would no > longer have the IP end-points of the SCTP association? Is yes, is that > desirable? > > On 3/28/07, Luis Ontanon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Would it be correct to add an AT_SS7_GT to the address types and have > > sccp/sua setting the GTs as pinfo->src & pinfo->dst ??? > > > > Isn't the global title an actual (transport) address? > > > > Luis > > > > -- > > This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. > > -- Marshall McLuhan > > _______________________________________________ > > Wireshark-dev mailing list > > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
