Hi, The question I've actually wanted to ask was: "Is there a way to distribute plugin dissectors separately from the Wireshark codebase?" The idea being that we review the plugin internally in AMQP working group before submitting it to you.
Thanks. Martin ronnie sahlberg wrote: > For inclusion into mainline wireshark, > please send the patch to the list for revies (unless it is very large > in case a url is better) > > also please provide a few example captures that we can use to test the > dissector with. > > > > On 3/21/07, Martin Sustrik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I've written dissector for AMQP protocol (www.amqp.org). >> >> It's in alpha version and I would like to distribute it among AMQP >> working group members to get comments/suggestions. >> >> Do you think it is appropriate to incorporate alpha version into >> Wireshark codebase? >> >> Or is there some other process already used in situations like this one? >> >> Thanks. >> Martin >> _______________________________________________ >> Wireshark-dev mailing list >> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org >> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
