On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:58:26AM +0100, Sake Blok wrote:
> I have not seen many
> patches being overlooked actually. There were the occasions where a review
> lasted a little longer, but most patches were commited within a couple of
> days. Maybe a patch-tracking system is a little overkill. The majority of
> patches seem to be easy to review and commit.
Something that we have (sort of) promoted in the past was the following:
Submit your patch to the ml. In case the patch isn't committed/nacked
within 3-4 days then open a bug and attach the patch to the bug. This
way the patch won't get lost and we don't have the management overhead
of tracking all the patches in the bugtracking system.
ciao
Joerg
--
Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that
works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology.
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
