> 
> It wouldn't be this one by any chance? Quoting myself from December 05
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> In openssl.h I had to change the typedef for X509_NAME and all the
> places it is used to something else because of some error I suspect (but
> couldn't prove) is a name clash. X509_NAME_SCREWS_UP_MSVC8 seems to be
> acceptable to the compiler.

Yes, exactly. But I don't tend to change the library sources (with the need to 
tweaking it each time a new gnutls version comes along) - we might need to talk 
to the gnutls developers for a new release with a fix for this.

In the meantime, I can live with gnutls simply disabled in config.nmake for now 
- as it's just optional.

> 
> But as I said then, the binaries would not run.
> 

Generating with the patches from Laurent (already checked in) my binaries are 
just running fine. There's need for me for some minor tweaking left (e.g. test 
correct unicode handling, installer, ...), but the general process is just 
working ok. ;-)))

However, I've only tested it on MS Visual C++ 2005 Express Edition with latest 
Platform SDK - I will test it on the 2005 Studio later.

Regards, ULFL
______________________________________________________________________
XXL-Speicher, PC-Virenschutz, Spartarife & mehr: Nur im WEB.DE Club!            
Jetzt gratis testen! http://freemail.web.de/home/landingpad/?mc=021130

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to