I sent a mail to the authors of RFC4590 and they claim that the table and IANA is wrong... So stick with:
106 is Digest-Response-Auth 107 is Digest-Nextnonce /Alex The response I got from Wolfgang: ------------------------------------------------------------- Alexander > In table 2 the Digest-Nextnonce and Digest-Response-Auth are numbered > 106 and 107. But furthur down they are numbered in reverse order. This is ugly. The numbering is consistent in the main text and in the attributes table. The exception is section 7, IANA considerations. It's wrong in the IANA registry www.iana.org as well. Not an excuse, but an explanation: the IANA section is inserted at the end of the standardization process. It did not get the same attention and review time as the rest of the text. > If you already know about this problem I am sorry for > spamming you. But I feel it is important that this error > doesn't sneek it's way into implementations... Hopefully, the implementors will stick to the text and to the attribute table in section 5. I've cc'ed this mail to the chairs of the RADEXT WG. We should correct the IANA registry entries and issue an errata. 106 is Digest-Response-Auth 107 is Digest-Nextnonce Wolfgang -- T-Systems Next Generation IP Services and Systems +49 6151 937 2863 Am Kavalleriesand 3 64295 Darmstadt Germany _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
