I suggest the second solution. It ensures that no interaction happens between the receive and send processes.
Loris ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 8:13 AM Subject: [WinPcap-users] pcap_sendpacket and pcap_next_ex on same pcap_open_live? > Have one thread performing pcap_open_live and then blocking on pcap_next_ex. > > Is it OK to have another thread, while the first is blocked in pcap_next_ex, invoke pcap_sendpacket on same pcap_open_live file? > > Or should the second thread invoke pcap_open_live a second time on the same device? > > Thanks. > > > ================================================================== > This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > To unsubscribe use > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ================================================================== ================================================================== This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ To unsubscribe use mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ==================================================================
