I'm using 3.0.  I'll try the 3.1 beta for a while.

Wow, you're right about my non-paged pool numbers.  Upon restarting my
machine I see it's down around 6 or 7 Mb.  I'll have to keep a close eye
on that to see if I can figure out what's sucking it up.

Thanks for your help.  While I suppose I'll still have to reboot
whenever this error pops up (unless 3.1 fixes it) at least now I have
something to look into.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gianluca Varenni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 8:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] Kernel Buffer Error
> 
> 
> Hi.
> 
> The non paged pool is absolutely too high: on my machine it's 
> about 10MB, on
> our SMP application server is 25 MB...
> 
> In the last mails you didn't corfirm me that you are using 
> WinPcap 3.1 beta.
> Can you please confirm this?
> We had a similar problem in one of our old versions (I think 
> winpcap 3.0
> alpha???), but they have been fixed in the subsequent versions.
> 
> Have a nice day
> GV
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Joel Moore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 11:31 PM
> Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] Kernel Buffer Error
> 
> 
> > Ok, it's happened again.  I'm getting the "not enough 
> memory to allocate
> > the kernel buffer" error again.
> >
> > My kernel memory statistics:
> >
> > Total: 113,300 Kb
> > Paged: 38,004 Kb
> > Nonpaged: 75,316 Kb
> >
> > Doesn't seem too drastic to me.  I'm not sure what else to check.
> >
> > Now I can't use Ethereal or Windump until I reboot.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Joel Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:46 PM
> > > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > > Subject: RE: [WinPcap-users] Kernel Buffer Error
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks, I'll keep an eye on it and report back when it
> > > happens again.  However, if I was running out of kernel
> > > memory wouldn't I be seeing problems elsewhere?
> > >
> > > Do you know if there's any way to track how much kernel
> > > memory each service is using?  XP doesn't seem to offer that
> > > kind of granularity.
> > >
> > > Just for the record, my current kernel memory statistics
> > > (approximate):
> > >
> > > Total: 101,904 Kb
> > > Paged:  40,828 Kb
> > > Non-paged: 61,100 Kb
> > >
> > > I tried Ethereal a few times and received no errors.
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Gianluca Varenni [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2004 9:08 AM
> > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] Kernel Buffer Error
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi.
> > > >
> > > > Are you using the latest version of WinPcap (3.1beta)? Can
> > > > you please have a
> > > > look at the memory usage of your system on the Task Manager,
> > > > in particular
> > > > the items "Paged" and "NonPaged" in the kernel memory part of
> > > > the mem usage?
> > > >
> > > > A user reported a similar problem, and it was actually due to
> > > > a service
> > > > leaking some resources. The consequence was that WinPcap was
> > > > not able to
> > > > allocate the appropriate resources for its work.
> > > >
> > > > Have a nice day
> > > > GV
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ==================================================================
> >  This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
> >  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> >
> >  To unsubscribe use
> >  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ==================================================================
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ==================================================================
>  This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
>  http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
> 
>  To unsubscribe use 
>  mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ==================================================================
> 
> 




==================================================================
 This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
 http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/

 To unsubscribe use 
 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==================================================================

Reply via email to