I'll check at them.
fulvio
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Guy Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: venerdi 11 aprile 2003 9.58
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] pcap_compile_nopcap
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 09:33:33AM +0200, Dries Decock wrote:
> > I've a question about the deprecated fuctions
>
> The "deprecated" and "discouraged" items in the function list have a
> number of problems, which probably need to be cleaned up:
>
> Unless there's a way to open a "dead" pcap_t with "pcap_open()",
> "pcap_open_dead()" cannot be deprecated in favor of
> "pcap_open()".
>
> If "pcap_findalldevs()" is deprecated in favor of
> "pcap_findalldevs_ex()", other functions should be deprecated in
> favor of "pcap_findalldevs_ex()", not in favor of
> "pcap_findalldevs()".
>
> "pcap_dump()" cannot be used instead of "pcap_file()" -
> "pcap_dump()" deals with writing savefiles, while "pcap_file()"
> deals with getting at the "FILE *" for the file from which a
> savefile is being read.
>
> "pcap_fileno()" can't be deprecated in general, as it's still
> useful on UNIX (and potentially necessary on UNIX, if you're
> going to use a "select()"/"poll()" loop), although it
> *can* be designated a UNIX-only function (in fact, perhaps it
> should be removed from WinPcap, by putting #ifndef WIN32/#endif
> around it).
>
>
> ==================================================================
> This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
>
> To unsubscribe use
> mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ==================================================================
==================================================================
This is the WinPcap users list. It is archived at
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
To unsubscribe use
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
==================================================================
