hi,I've just read your "An Architecture for High Performance Network Analysis" ,eager to see your next paper. can you mail me when it's finish? i'm working on a program which base on winpcap,and efficiency is the top problem . Thanks! ����
======= 2002-05-27 �������������======= >Very good question. >We are currently working hard to profile and optimize winpcap, so we hope to >release detailed results and a more efficient driver in the next months. >The performance of WinPcap under the different WinNTx systems is >approxiamtely the same, because the packet drivers share the same code and >the underlying OSes are very similar. Linux on the other side has lower >performance, because its kernel architecture is less evolute. If you are >interested in performance under Unix, I suggest a BSD OS, whose BPF shows >good results. It was used as reference when developing our system, so the >performance are comparable with winpcap 2.3. > >Loris > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Flyhi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 3:00 PM >Subject: [WinPcap-users] packet capture efficiency > > >hi > can you compare the packet capture efficiency of libpcap(or >winpcap)working under Linux ,Win2k server ,Win2k Pro,WinNt4 >and Win XP? > for example ,when the network load is 148000pps, which operation >system can capture more packets ? >����������������������������Flyhi >����������������������������[EMAIL PROTECTED] >����������������������������������2002-05-25 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
