I am using the packet drivers as a replacement for a direct port based control of a NE2000 netcard and in general the the speed is the same or faster depending on several factors.
Jens. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gianluca Varenni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:34 AM Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] winpcap performance - 2 > Hi. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Selcuk Cevher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:39 AM > Subject: [WinPcap-users] winpcap performance - 2 > > > > hi.. > > i am trying to develope a kind of sniffer program using Visual C++(MFC)and > > under Windows 2000 advanced server platform ,which will examine ALL IP > > packets on an Ethernet and record only those > > packets or packet segments that meet very specific parameters,as my > graduate > > thesis.So i want to select the right tool to perform this.So,have you got > > any suggestions to help me select the right tool(winpcap or something > else)? > > I need the fastest one possible.thanks... > > I cannot state that "winPcap is absolutely the fastest packet capture > architecture". WinPcap is very fast, in fact it is used by the most part of > free Windows sniffers/monitors... > > Moreover, you can find a very small text on the factors that influence the > performance in another msg in this mailing list; you can find it at > http://www.mail-archive.com/winpcap-users%40winpcap.polito.it/msg00080.html > > GV > > > > > aksuvari > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Join the world�s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > > http://www.hotmail.com > > > > > >
