No problem. Did you find an answer to your question on the FAQs?
SMP machine problem? This is the main difference between 2.2 and 2.3: v2.2 did not check the precence of more than 1 CPU, so it seems to work, but the results can be wrong; v2.3 checks if more than 1 CPU is present, and therefore blocks the loading of the driver. GV ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Pifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 1:00 AM Subject: Re: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap version 2.3 > No I didn't read the FAQ. Made too many assumptions because the older > version works(not sure that it's correct to call it the older version). > Didn't think it would be that big of a deal. > > Sorry. > > > On Wed, 2002-04-24 at 14:19, Gianluca Varenni wrote: > > Hi. > > First of all, did you read the FAQs at http://winpcap.polito.it? > > > > Is the Proliant server a SMP machine? If so, as clearly stated on the FAQs, > > WinPcap does NOT support SMP, at the moment. > > > > If it's not the case, please follow the instructions to report bugs at > > http://winpcap.polito.it/contact.htm > > > > GV > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James Pifer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 7:12 PM > > Subject: [WinPcap-users] Winpcap version 2.3 > > > > > > > I seem to be having a lot of problems getting the newer versions of > > > Winpcap installed. > > > > > > For example, I'm trying to install it on a Proliant server running > > > Windows NT 4 SP6a. The install runs fine, I even reboot, but Ethereal > > > does not see the NIC. > > > > > > I believe this is a winpcap problem, but please correct me if I'm > > > mistaken. > > > > > > How can I troubleshoot this? I've had this happen on several different > > > types of machines I've tried to install it on. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > James > > > > > > > > > > >
