-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 2013-09-17 17:12, schrieb Henri Verbeet: > The point is that the distinction you're making here between > volumes and everything else is a bit arbitrary, and I think this > patch as it is will make it more work rather than less to move > towards having a set of capability flags per resource type. The > advantage of the alternative is mostly that it's less invasive, so > easier to change later. I might have misunderstood what you meant with "separate flags for each GL resource type". Did you mean something like this
B8G8R8A8_UNORM.flags[texture2d] = RENDERTARGET | TEXTURE | ...; B8G8R8A8_UNORM.flags[renderbuffer] = RENDERTARGET | ...; B8G8R8A8_UNORM.flags[texture3d] = TEXTURE | ...; Instead of B8G8R8A8_UNORM.flags = RENDERTARGET | TEXTURE2D | TEXTURE3D | RENDERBUFFER | TEXTURECUBE | ...; ? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSOKiCAAoJEN0/YqbEcdMwdzwP/2+jmNXdtZNJY6KOFXgAXAS9 qvER27doBcBdgBYfOn+1EuntCqFgF/mWFdt4Qt9bsNsjoffli90vjymmW58CgXjl 6403DPS17Zw01dWQYtNIeIDdzP74pcIuIbaZ9l63XDDk/k42ne4VleJW2UehQT8/ 91Ft/K1puR/ENQ8ka9WxAirJAqV7CV7hgpUrraAE0xWNXD3tXhDnVvEL9bnuk226 gGm8jeDsl8GX9/LL+Lcud5KK1R66xD5SJCbL8rXmZijiq5molBLMMDO6HMV2z9Zf XDFekLqTs51pQjNc163yoKa3vfA0sUa2tOwA+KzPTuiimowAZy8qS6CkAyhJGOJn aTiCOLW6p3Ywsct6NkRwKXjbbi6RJcXRbKsLsBklHPFrhmNthbgdQoKkdDX+G3qZ +kG7N8w402bvNqUv4eZ3d6vwwrKd2ma35kjw/CrTObliQfWgPmSQM1gXA+zGtkPc q/1e1VufQ34+QI7osIIdpl5uIaeg/gGrYB1qCjSmpQQWUiJB2WfLRLj2Czw0+uUJ gTK41YrU3axBQOl7NuZu8d6P1RkSfyZkFUX6abfF8NGFCn4CSOXuCOr5GlEblI9O o2s0cKH43Zu+s/mk4xsnb2pR+WiKSU1vFrrvLFIecP07y53w4eqxhaL7CcEBphOu 3kYjieSGTr6zGho/PaNF =vnJi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
