On 18 June 2010 15:52, Iain Arnell <[email protected]> wrote: > - dsty + rsrc->bottom - rsrc->top > This->surface_desc.dwHeight) > + dsty + rsrc->bottom - rsrc->top > This->surface_desc.dwHeight || > + (dstx | dsty) & (1<<(sizeof(DWORD)*8-1)) /* dstx or dsty negative > */ ) That's not very pretty. This looks like it's just an integer overflow, so that's probably also how you should handle it.
