On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 22:39 +0200, Alexandre Julliard wrote: > Joel Holdsworth <[email protected]> writes: > > > Are you sure? I really do think using PNGs is preferable. The PNG is > > 22.8kB, whereas a BMP would be 237.2kB - over 10x larger! If I use a > > BMP, it will make the winecfg executable bloat up 25%. > > > > By contrast importing GDI+ or WIC seems to me like a small price to pay. > > We can add support for PNG icons after 1.2. Adding more dependencies to > winecfg is much more risky than a bloated icon. >
Ok, that's cool. I'll try and get that sorted within a couple of days. One other question; I got some feedback from Andre Herschel saying that the patch failed to apply to some of the language rc files. I suspected he ran into problems with varying character encodings. Did the patch "[PATCH 4/4] winecfg: Cosmetic improvements to the about panel" apply cleanly for you?
