On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov <[email protected]> wrote: > Henri Verbeet <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Ideally all regressions would be bisected, but that's clearly not the >> case. You can of course argue about terminology and / or mechanism, >> but I think it's useful to distinguish "possible" regressions from >> confirmed regressions with a commit id. Personally I think it would be >> nice if bugzilla could give me a list of commit id's and associated >> bugs, so I could use git and some scripting to do additional >> processing on that. > > Probably it would be better to add a field for commit id that caused > a regression just like there is one for url/keywords instead of inventing > new keywords. So a 'regression' with a commit id would automatically mean > 'bisected'. That would also save time of finding the commit id by looking > at every comment in the bug, and possibly avoiding finding incorrect > bisect results.
If editing Bugzilla's layout is easy to do, I like this option. -- -Austin
