On 5/1/2010 21:52, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
ChangeLog:
Remove variable res which is not really used from test_XcvClosePort.
We should better test for return value than remove it.
Okay. Is this something you can look into (or do you have a hint
on how you'd like such a test to look like)? It would be great
could you make this change, but if you have guidance I will do my
best to give it a try, too.
Gerald
This is a primitive thing, try it if you didn't before.
All you need is to add some lines like:
---
ok(res == ERROR_SUCCESS /*a proper code here*/, "expected ERROR_SUCCESS,
got %d\n", res);
---
After that run a test on Windows and Wine (using a bot for example) and
make corrections if needed.
