> From: Ilya Basin <[email protected]> > > Then postponing till my next slack period, the more so I got another > e-mail: > > === W7PROX64 (32 bit shlexec) === > No test failures found > > === W7PROX64 (64 bit shlexec) === > > shell32: > shlexec.c:1609: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(null, > "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt1F81.tmp\test file.sde", null, null) > failed: rc=29 err=2 > shlexec.c:1609: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(null, > "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt1F81.tmp\test file.sde", null, null) > failed: rc=29 err=2 > shlexec.c:1609: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(null, > "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt1F81.tmp\test file.sde", null, null) > failed: rc=29 err=2 > shlexec.c:1609: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(null, > "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt1F81.tmp\test file.sde", null, null) > failed: rc=29 err=2 > shlexec.c:1609: Test failed: ShellExecuteEx(null, > "C:\Users\winetest\AppData\Local\Temp\wt1F81.tmp\test file.sde", null, null) > failed: rc=29 err=2 > > Strange, isn't it? I wonder if the tests succeeded without my patch.
Those failures are also present without your patch, see https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=1696#k105 Ge.
