On 10/12/2009 10:36 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
James McKenzie wrote:
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
James McKenzie wrote:
Nikolay Sivov wrote:
chris ahrendt wrote:
[/home/cahrendt/wine-git/dlls/kernel32/resource.c:1279]: (error)
Division by zero
False positive I suppose:
---
static const BYTE pad[] = {
'P','A','D','D','I','N','G','X','X','P','A','D','D','I','N','G' };
DWORD i;
-> for ( i = 0; i< size / sizeof pad; i++ )
---
Should pad be enclosed in parenthesis?
James McKenzie
No, why?
I was thinking that c specifies sizeof needs the parameter to be
enclosed in parathesis like this sizeof (pad) but I may be incorrect.
James McKenzie
This is for type names, variables could be used without enclosing.
Thank you for the clarification on the use of sizeof.
sizeof is not a function but an operator. Thus the same rules apply to
it as to other operators. People just like to write sizeof as a function.
bye
michael
