On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Remco <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Rosanne DiMesio<[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:48:17 +0200 > > Remco <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Ok, I thought everybody got their AppDB updates by mail. But whichever > >> way you receive notice of queued submissions without maintainers, > >> that's where the maintained submissions can be sent after 24 hours. > >> > >> Remco > > > > Admins can already see all test reports in the queue. That's not the > issue. The issue is removing maintainers who aren't doing their job. If we > do their job for them, with no consequences to the negligent maintainer, > that merely covers up the problem. > > So the issue is not that queued submissions aren't handled, but... > what? I thought the problem was unhandled submissions, caused by > negligent maintainers. But if that problem is not there, what problem > are negligent maintainers causing? > > Remco > > It sounds like they're causing too much extra work for the admins. What if the system checked for "Out of Office" bounces and used that to know that a maintainer was not going to be able to handle the submission for a while?
Erich Hoover [email protected]
