On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Dan Kegel <d...@kegel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov > <dmi...@codeweavers.com> wrote: >> The exception tests in ntdll is a nice example how to do that >> without hurting readability and maintainability. > > Sure, it's doable, but after a while one's fingers begin > to bleed. It all depends on how much code we're talking > about, and how many people we expect to be able to > write DOS testcases. > > Do you see any harm in using nasm? I can't imagine > it would be hard to update our list of build dependencies, > and if anybody doesn't have it for some reason, no harm done... > - Dan > > >
How about we merge in the wine16 tests while we're at it? -- -Austin
