On 5/31/07, Tom Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/31/07, Jesse Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Remember that this is only my opinion. Other people handle things a > little different. It is probably true that the two recent bugs you > mentioned I would have closed, but it was only resolved. It's just how > it was handled. If you want to close bugs that are clearly done with > like that, it's fine by me. And I do close bug reports with other > status too, if it's one I really don't want to see again. > > If it's clear why you are closing bugs, it's all fine by me, whatever it is. Just to clarify my reasoning, because I just now thought about the _real_ reasoning lol, I often look thru lists of bugs that are resolved as fixed and (although i havent done it in a few years, i was going to start again), post a message to ask if the reporter can confirm if it is fixed. So I was closing bugs that were invalid/abandoned/dupe/worksforme so that they wouldnt show in the lists of resolved bugs, so its less I have to sort thru....
Bug triage is a good idea so that stuff like this gets cleaned up. I'm not sure what everyone wants though. I guess you can figure that out :P
