"Phil Lodwick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Active_hooks is pretty much set by the server. Bit 0x80000000 is set to > indicate that the bitmask is valid. One of my suspicions that I hope to > confirm with debug is that in my case of failure active_hooks is 0. > > Would it not make more sense to return FALSE from this routine in that case? > That is to say, if the bitmask is NOT valid, miss processing the hook instead > of erroneously trying to process a hook that is not set.
The idea is that active_hooks is a shortcut to avoid calling the server if we know that a hook is not set. If we don't have a valid active_hooks then we need to call the server, which will then tell us whether or not we really have a hook to call. -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
