Andrew Talbot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In our case, MSIITERHANDLE is declared as a pointer to void, so > > const MSIITERHANDLE *handle; > > is equivalent to > > void *const *handle; > > whereas > > MSICITERHANDLE *handle; > > is equivalent to > > const void **handle; > > which, I believe, is what is required. Hence, my new type definition.
Actually from reading the code there doesn't seem to be a reason for having the non-const variant, and also no reason to use a void* instead of a proper type. The definition should probably be something like "typedef const struct tagMSICOLUMNHASHENTRY *MSIITERHANDLE". -- Alexandre Julliard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
