James Hawkins wrote: > On 10/10/06, Segin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> Some Google searching provides that there may or may not be an >> implementation. >> >> http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-svn/2005-August/005303.html >> ([ros-svn] [weiden] 17572: implemented RegDeleteTree() (untested!)) >> mentions this, and nothing more: >> --- CUT --- >> implemented RegDeleteTree() (untested!) >> >> Updated files: >> trunk/reactos/lib/advapi32/reg/reg.c >> --- CUT --- >> The code moved around in their tree a bit, it's actually >> trunk/reactos/dll/win32/advapi32/reg/reg.c, and you can view the code >> here: >> http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos/trunk/reactos/dll/win32/advapi32/reg/reg.c?view=markup >> >> > > We don't accept code from the ReactOS project. >
Thought it was a good idea at the time, but I can understand why you
wouldn't accept it. (I can assume that this has to do with ensuring that
the code is honest, due to the previous ReactOS "scandal")
--
The real problem with C++ for kernel modules is: the language just sucks.
-- Linus Torvalds
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
