Hi, Is there something wrong with this patch / a reason it's not being accepted?
Sorry if this might have been answered this on IRC last night - X died while I was away, so I'd have missed it. Thanks, --Matt Finnicum On 8/19/06, Matt Finnicum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I've cleaned up / re-diffed this patch from Brian Chang. It fixes bug 4462 by handling several odd ways in which EM_EXSETSEL can be called. It also make the message return a proper value, not just zero. --Matt Finnicum (Please commit as Brian Chang) The last version of this patch can be found here: http://www.winehq.com/pipermail/wine-patches/2006-March/024976.html --- dlls/riched20/editor.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--- dlls/riched20/tests/editor.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
