On 6/2/06, Alexandre Julliard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about this: we combine the original sychronous approach
> with the small preallocated cache as a fallback for when
> no threads are waiting?
You need to have a thread waiting one way or another, since you need
to perform operations on the client side that require a thread
context. No, it's not an easy problem to solve, that's why it has not
been done yet...
Are you willing to accept a patch which makes some common use
cases work well, but does not address others?
If so, we can continue. Otherwise we'll have to wash our hands
and walk away screaming.
- Dan
--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv
