Saulius Krasuckas wrote:
* On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Karl Lattimer wrote:
And also, accusing people of having an IQ of 0 for replying to a flame
isn't in the slightest constructive,
Hardly. I have actually done something good. I got people to addresses
the Winetools problem a bit early. Sure, it would have gotten adressed
anyways, but only after enough complains come rolling in, months or
years from now. When I sent the flame, i had a purpose, a plan, and a
hoped outcome. The end result was nothing but good, so why shun me? I
was just getting a matter addressed before we have no choice but to
address it. We can't just put it off forever, you know.
Yes, he didn't write any single patch yet that was accepted, still he
manages to joke calling one of the developers being a monkey. (Given that
monkeys can't even distinguish between MUAs and MTAs nowadays)
I haven't written any patches, namely because my eariler code changes i
find cause signal 11. Recently I am working on something that will be
offloaded months from now (if i dont find it to be too fustrating) as a
huge diff, so keep your eyes peeled. If it doesn't work on either of my
systems, it's broken, and sending a diff is a waste of everybody's time.
Being of sensitive nature I'd remove him from the list so he will find
appropriate lists to talk constructively in. (Be I wine-devel moderator)
|
- Re: [OT] Re: Why winetools is utterly useless, once and for all. Segin
-
