On Sat, Oct 01, 2005 at 11:07:39AM -0700, Dan Kegel wrote: > Marcus Meissner wrote: > >>http://kegel.com/wine/qa/autoresolve.html > > > >I am not sure that I like this approach. > >It might appear to our users that we do not care. > > I bet we can word the message to avoid that appearance. > > We could even have the message simply say > > Are you still interested in this bug? > > rather than asking them to retest the bug. That > would have nearly the same effect, and sounds a lot nicer. > I've updated the page to reflect this more friendly wording. > > >The timelines are a bit strict too. ;) > > The message makes it clear that the bug can be > reopened at any time. I think that takes away > the strictness you're worried about. > > How do you feel about it with those changes?
Actually I think a bunch of volunteers has gone over most of the issue manually now... This lead to more instantely closed bugs ;) So an automated approach is no longer necessary I guess. Ciao, Marcus
