In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I believe there was a problem with constructors being called in > reverse link order. Also any object file of the dll can potentially > have a .init section which would then break badly.
I guess configure could test the constructor semantics, since I think neither of these would be issues on OpenBSD ... > Anyway, that constructor stuff is going to change [...]. I'm working on a > patch to do that, which will hopefully solve your problem at the same > time. ... but this seems like a better idea. I'll wait for your patch and see how it goes. :-)
