> > > > Why about trying to get this driver working on top of current ntdll ? > > All drivers accesses should pass by kernel calls no ? > > In the perfect world, yes.. but this is not how most copy protections > do it. > > Using the copy protection's driver directly will IMHO not be possible > without emulating certain things for the driver and this is probably > also illegal in respect to the DMCA. (lying to the kernel mode driver > is kind of the same as lying to the user-mode part of the protection, > no?!)
If it should be true (sure that it isn't ;), i don't know why ms doesn't includes secdrv.sys in the core, and calls it from ntdll, what should be the end of wine running native applications ;) Regards, Carlos. -- ___ _ \ | / Consulting | . |._ _ _| | ___ ___ ___ http://www.andago.com | || ' |/ . |<_> |/ . |/ . \__ GNU/Linux |_|_||_|_|\___|<___|\_. |\___/ _ \ __|\ \ / Carlos A. Lozano <___'/ | \ -_) __/\__ \ > < -_) [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ]\___|_| ____/ _/\_\___| [ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] http://www.ePSXe.com
