Am Do., 9. Aug. 2018 um 13:50 Uhr schrieb Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]>:
> To begin with, punishment of any infraction that occurred in a > publicly-accessible forum such as Phabricator can be public. If the > infraction itself can remain public, the punishment for it can also. > That seems like a good starting point. This argument doesn’t work at all, IMHO. Suppose I revealed the real name of an anonymous contributor in a Phabricator comment (accidentally or as deliberate doxxing) – just because I thought that this comment could be public surely doesn’t mean that it should stay public, or that the subsequent interaction with the CoCC should be public. Of course, I’m not saying that what happened here was equivalent to doxxing – I just don’t think it at all follows that the punishment should be public just because the infraction was. Cheers, Lucas -- Lucas Werkmeister Software Developer (working student) Wikimedia Deutschland e. V. | Tempelhofer Ufer 23-24 | 10963 Berlin Phone: +49 (0)30 219 158 26-0 https://wikimedia.de Imagine a world, in which every single human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge. That‘s our commitment. Wikimedia Deutschland - Gesellschaft zur Förderung Freien Wissens e. V. Eingetragen im Vereinsregister des Amtsgerichts Berlin-Charlottenburg unter der Nummer 23855 B. Als gemeinnützig anerkannt durch das Finanzamt für Körperschaften I Berlin, Steuernummer 27/029/42207. _______________________________________________ Wikitech-l mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikitech-l
